If you are visually impaired or blind, you can visit the PDF version by Pressing CONTROL + ALT + 4
You need a JavaScript-enabled browser to view this Publication
Please follow these steps to view the Publication:
Enable JavaScript in your browser
Refresh this page
Best regards
Zmags
THE JOURNAL OF 1996
PERFORMANCE Celebrating 30 Years
MEASUREMENT 2026
®
THE PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT RESOURCE VOLUME 24 : NUMBER 4
VOLUME 30 : NUMBER 1
INSIDE THIS ISSUE - FALL 2025
n OPINION: IMPROVING ATTRIBUTION EVEN FURTHER:
THE COUNTER-FACTUAL MODEL
n THE IMPORTANCE OF DATA QUALITY CHECKS IN TOTAL
RETURN CALCULATIONS
n INTEGRATING RISK AND RETURN: A UNIFIED APPROACH TO
PERFORMANCE ATTRIBUTION
n THE JOURNAL INTERVIEW - SHIFAT HASAN, CFA, CMA
n COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ICB AND GICS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS
n THE INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT PROFESSIONAL
n LANDMARK ARTICL
THE JOURNAL OF 1996 PERFOR
Train Your Entire Performance staff for half pric
The Journal of Performance Measurement®
The Journal of Performance Measurement
THERE’S A LOT ON YOUR PLATE— RISING CLIENT DEMAND
Letter from the Editor This issue marks the
The Standard for Investment Data Management. Emp
Letter from the Publisher As you can see fr
The Journal of Performance Measureme
VOICES IN VERIFICATION An interview series hosted
VOICES IN VERIFICATION “Seek out internships or p
VOICES IN VERIFICATION Kathleen Seagle,
OPINION Improving Attribution Even Further: The C
from a group of four or five choices which are de
new ideas from a hash of an outline I sent him, s
The Importance of Data Quality Checks in Total Re
Table 2: Start Portfolio
The above impact of 10 bp on the return is small,
5. CAN CHANGING THE TIMING OF CASH FLOWS
extra step that is now taken is that the new clie
Table 17: Calculation Weights and Returns; Trade
tribution. Recall the situation in Section 3 abou
weight of -105%, a securities weight of 205% and
Integrating Risk and Return: A Unified Approach t
2. The assignment of an expected return to each
tation of the weighted sum of correlations, viewi
dress this issue, we draw upon modern portfolio t
= × � , −
risk–return trade-off. In contrast, an analysis o
served ratio for the review period or by using ma
Table 4 This table provides the results for the
Table 5 Brinson Volatility Attribu
Table 7 Contribution to IR ALP
Grégoire, Philippe, and Herve Van Oppens (2006).
We’re Everything You Need in a GIPS® Standards Ve
The Journal Interview Shifat Hasan, CFA, CMA is
responsible for policy and governance and really,
do you explain what you do for a living to friend
SH: Yes, French fries. PF: Oh, that's awesome.
Comparative Analysis of ICB and GICS Classificati
20133 and 2014,4 which does examine each classifi
Table 2: Industry/Sector Naming Convention – ICB
Figure 2: Allocation of Stocks Placed in a Differ
Figure 4: Scatterplots of Betas for Companies Uni
Figure 5: Allocation of Stocks Placed in a Differ
ICB and GICS Consumer Discretionary The FTSE All
are cyclical in nature (discretionary). This incl
Figure 12: Allocation of Stocks Placed in a Diffe
Figure 14: Allocation of Stocks Placed in a Diffe
ICB Telecommunications to GICS Industrials, 4, 1
Figure 18: Allocation of Stocks Placed in a Diffe
American Express, Visa, and Mastercard, with a co
Figure 22: GICS Classifications used in LSEG Glob
Table 3: Summary of Findings from Risk Model Comp
= ( − )( − ) Where:
Concluding Remarks on ICB vs GICS Industry/Sector
The Investment Performance Measurement Profession
istrators, and data vendors create integration ch
· Policies and procedures are clearly document
Evaluation of Portfolio Performance: Aggregate Re
Fall 2025
The Journal of Performance Measurement
Fall 2025
The Journal of Performance Measurement
Fall 2025
The Journal of Performance Measurement
Fall 2025
The Journal of Performance Measurement
Fall 2025
The Journal of Performance Measurement
The Journal of Performance Measurement Manuscript